Sat, 2011-10-29 02:36
Third party defamation is from now on completly and utterly banned from the Enclave, it is allready in the server rules but due to experience it has been decided to make this rule explicit to avoid any misunderstandings, whatsoever:
By playing in the Enclave and being a part of these forums you accept that you will not defame, critize, slander, or otherwise make any negative comments about other players unless you address them directly or a DM, by playing in the Enclave, and being a part of these forums, you accept that third party defamation is a cause for your character to be removed from these forums and subsequently from the Enclave itself. Simply put, the rules are as follows:
EDIT:
p.s.
As stated, and I restate this for clarity: This is allready in the terms for playing on Haven in the first place, no one should have any problems writing "I agree" to this. Here is the rules again for your convenience:
No godmodding, griefing, or general ass-hattery. We are here to have fun. (And "I am just playing my char" is no shield.)
Source:
http://nwnhaven.com/wiki/server-rules
By playing in the Enclave and being a part of these forums you accept that you will not defame, critize, slander, or otherwise make any negative comments about other players unless you address them directly or a DM, by playing in the Enclave, and being a part of these forums, you accept that third party defamation is a cause for your character to be removed from these forums and subsequently from the Enclave itself. Simply put, the rules are as follows:
Quote:
If you have a problem with another player, take it to that player or the DM team. Going to another player, even if that one is your friend, is dragging them into the drama and it is spoiling their chances of fun RP with the person you dislike.
Remember, we're all here to have fun, and lets try to keep it this way:
Third party slander, as the above, is a cause for removal of your characters from the Enclave. We are done with drama.![]()
EDIT:
p.s.
As stated, and I restate this for clarity: This is allready in the terms for playing on Haven in the first place, no one should have any problems writing "I agree" to this. Here is the rules again for your convenience:
No godmodding, griefing, or general ass-hattery. We are here to have fun. (And "I am just playing my char" is no shield.)
Source:
http://nwnhaven.com/wiki/server-rules
Sat, 2011-10-29 02:47
#1
I completely agree with all rules.
Sat, 2011-10-29 03:01
#2
fine with rules.
Sat, 2011-10-29 03:05
#3
I agree.
Sat, 2011-10-29 03:36
#4
I agree.
Sat, 2011-10-29 03:37
#5
I also agree
Sat, 2011-10-29 04:36
#6
Agreed.
Sat, 2011-10-29 05:08
#7
I agree. My character will still be a bitch, but Im not
Sat, 2011-10-29 08:51
#8
Weeeee.... *huggles*
Is good.
Is good.
Sat, 2011-10-29 10:34
#9
sure.
Sat, 2011-10-29 10:37
#10
i agree
Sat, 2011-10-29 10:38
#11
i agree
Sat, 2011-10-29 11:11
#12
I agree.
Sat, 2011-10-29 12:15
#13
You all have access again. Will check the forum tomorow again so excuse every possible delay.
Sat, 2011-10-29 15:00
#14
I agree
Sat, 2011-10-29 17:02
#15
I concur.
Sat, 2011-10-29 22:36
#16
I agree
Sat, 2011-10-29 23:02
#17
I agree
Sun, 2011-10-30 05:55
#18
i agree also and for the record, just because Elli's a bitch doesn't mean i am so please don't take in-character persona personally.
Sometimes i feel bad when Elli is being rude to someone other than Kara.
wait, did i just join the enclave?
Sometimes i feel bad when Elli is being rude to someone other than Kara.wait, did i just join the enclave?
Sun, 2011-10-30 05:59
#19
I agree.
Sun, 2011-10-30 13:33
#20
Agreed
Sun, 2011-10-30 13:56
#21
agree
Sun, 2011-10-30 15:26
#22
Signed
and agreed
and agreed
Mon, 2011-10-31 00:48
#23
yup )
Mon, 2011-10-31 01:32
#24
I be AGRRRRRREEEeeable!
Fo reals dog.
Don't be an asshat, Simple enough
Fo reals dog.
Don't be an asshat, Simple enough
Mon, 2011-10-31 07:37
#25
I agree
Mon, 2011-10-31 08:35
#26
I agree
As a note.. Probably didn't need to agree three times.. But oh well.
As a note.. Probably didn't need to agree three times.. But oh well.
Mon, 2011-10-31 15:50
#27
I agree (found out that Sandra got back but not Daronna
Tue, 2011-11-01 08:38
#28
I agree.
Wed, 2011-11-02 13:56
#29
Agreed
Wed, 2011-11-02 13:57
#30
Ok
Fri, 2011-11-04 11:21
#31
I agree with the rules, count on my discretion on everything.
Sun, 2011-11-06 20:17
#32
I agree with the rules above.
Mon, 2011-11-07 01:48
#33
I agree!!
Mon, 2011-11-07 22:39
#34
Agreed
Thu, 2011-11-10 05:36
#35
I agree (Fourth time!)
Thu, 2011-11-10 16:27
#36
I agree
Fri, 2011-11-11 01:05
#37
I agree
Sat, 2011-11-12 19:55
#38
I agree.
Sun, 2011-11-13 09:51
#39
I completly agree with all rules and ask to be added to the group as a slave
thank you ^^
thank you ^^
Sun, 2011-11-13 14:17
#40
I completly agree
Sun, 2011-11-13 17:56
#41
(Alrighty...will give Dionysus, Rakshada and Kaziel after meeting them in game
Btw..
1. to avoid confusion let me say that you dont have to accept the rule for every new character you make since you accept as player. Just request membership for all character you want access for and I will give you access..
2. I will delete all character from the memberlist of the Thayan enclave who havent accepted the rule here after two weeks..
thx and regards
Lara)
Btw..
1. to avoid confusion let me say that you dont have to accept the rule for every new character you make since you accept as player. Just request membership for all character you want access for and I will give you access..
2. I will delete all character from the memberlist of the Thayan enclave who havent accepted the rule here after two weeks..
thx and regards
Lara)
Mon, 2011-11-14 10:14
#42
eeeep, I accept, I accept
Tue, 2011-11-15 10:55
#43
I am fine with these rules and welcome the chance to be part of the enclave
character: Kalyndra
character: Kalyndra
Wed, 2011-11-16 00:17
#44
I agree
Sun, 2011-11-20 09:27
#45
Khyra's Symbol is placed here in agreement
Thu, 2011-11-24 10:51
#46
I understand the rules and agree fully to them.
Nagaphin
Nagaphin
Fri, 2011-11-25 11:21
#47
I agree
Nia
Nia
Sat, 2011-12-03 06:07
#48
I accept the terms
Sat, 2011-12-03 07:19
#49
This one agrees fully to the statement made above.
Kent Rothe
Kent Rothe
Sat, 2011-12-03 09:57
#50
I agree to this.




Recent comments
33 min 2 sec ago
1 hour 20 min ago
2 hours 7 min ago
2 hours 20 min ago
5 hours 13 min ago
5 hours 17 min ago
5 hours 50 min ago
6 hours 14 min ago
6 hours 31 min ago
7 hours 46 min ago